Kyiv 2022: The Battle for Ukraine’s Capital – An In-Depth Review

Mark Galeotti’s Kyiv 2022: The Battle for Ukraine’s Capital is a concise yet deeply researched account of one of the defining moments of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Published in June 2026, this illustrated paperback captures the chaos, courage, and critical decisions that shaped the defense of Kyiv in the early weeks of the war.

Overview

This book is part of Osprey’s acclaimed “Raid” series, known for blending sharp military analysis with accessible storytelling and detailed visuals. In just eighty pages, Galeotti offers a focused narrative of Russia’s failed attempt to capture Kyiv and the remarkable resilience shown by Ukrainian defenders.

Purpose and Approach

Rather than a broad war chronicle, this volume zeroes in on the pivotal events surrounding the capital. Galeotti examines how the Russian high command planned a lightning strike to decapitate Ukraine’s leadership, expecting a quick and decisive victory. He then traces how those plans unraveled under fierce resistance, poor logistics, and unexpected Ukrainian strength.

The book explores the tactical, logistical, and psychological dimensions of the battle. It walks readers through Russia’s early strategy to seize key points such as Hostomel Airport, its miscalculations about supply lines and morale, and how Ukraine’s defenders, supported by civilians, thwarted what was supposed to be a swift takeover. The story concludes with Russia’s retreat and the symbolic turning point it represented for both nations.

Structure and Content

The book is organized around several clear phases. It begins by setting the stage, explaining the pre-war buildup, the assumptions on both sides, and the intelligence failures that led to misjudged expectations. It then dives into the execution of the assault, the airborne raids, and the disastrous congestion of the long Russian convoy that became a symbol of overreach.

From there, Galeotti moves into analysis—dissecting the reasons behind the Russian failure, from poor coordination and communication to the underestimation of Ukrainian morale. The closing sections place the battle in context, showing how the defense of Kyiv reshaped the wider conflict and shattered the myth of Russian invincibility.

Strengths

One of the book’s greatest strengths is its clarity. Galeotti writes with precision and authority, distilling complex military operations into an engaging narrative. His experience in Russian military and security affairs gives the analysis weight, while the visual aids—maps, photos, and artwork—help the reader understand the terrain and the tactical choices made during the fighting.

The balance of military detail and readability makes this book suitable for both experts and general readers. It also benefits from the inclusion of perspectives from both sides, giving a sense of authenticity and depth to the account. The book’s focus on Kyiv allows it to avoid the clutter of larger war studies and instead highlight the human and strategic drama of those crucial first weeks.

Limitations

Because of its brief format, the book cannot explore every battle or delve deeply into the civilian experience. Readers seeking personal stories, frontline testimonies, or a broader political history of the war may find it somewhat narrow. The short page count also means that some details are summarized rather than explored fully.

Another limitation lies in timing. With the book arriving only a few years after the events it describes, much of the information still depends on partial or contested sources. As the war continues to unfold and archives open, future historians may refine or challenge some of its conclusions.

Key Insights

The capture and loss of Hostomel Airport emerge as a central theme, symbolizing the gap between Russia’s ambition and execution. The infamous forty-mile convoy north of Kyiv serves as a lesson in logistical failure. Galeotti shows how the defense of Kyiv combined professional tactics with improvised urban warfare and civilian resistance, illustrating a modern model of national resilience.

Most importantly, the book makes clear that Russia’s failure to seize Kyiv was not merely a battlefield loss—it was a strategic and psychological collapse that forced Moscow to redefine its entire campaign. For Ukraine, it marked the moment when survival turned into determination and global perception shifted in its favor.

Audience

This book is ideal for readers of military history, analysts of modern warfare, or anyone who wants to understand why the Battle of Kyiv became the war’s first great turning point. Its accessible style makes it a strong introduction for newcomers, while its analysis and visual presentation will appeal to more seasoned students of conflict.

Conclusion

Kyiv 2022: The Battle for Ukraine’s Capital is a sharp, authoritative account of how an outnumbered nation stopped a major invasion at its gates. Mark Galeotti succeeds in combining historical accuracy, clear analysis, and visual storytelling into a compact but powerful work. While limited by its length and the freshness of the events it describes, it stands as one of the most vivid and informative examinations of the early war in Ukraine.

It is not just a story of military failure and success—it is the story of how Kyiv, against all odds, held the line and changed the course of modern history.

Get Kyiv 2022 On Amazon!

In-Depth Review — WW3 Has Begun: Nothing Is Random, Everything Was Scripted (2025–2032). — You Were Never Meant to Know: How the Fall of Europe, the Rise of Asia

Christopher Parson’s WW3 Has Begun arrives as a confident, argumentative work that blends geopolitics, conspiracy theory, and speculative forecasting into a single, polemical volume. The book’s subtitle and marketing position it as an exposé: a grand narrative in which twentieth- and twenty-first-century power shifts are not accidents but the results of long-running, intentional designs. It presents itself as uncovering insider insights, suppressed letters, and military doctrines that allegedly reveal a hidden three-phase war plan stretching back centuries.

What the book sets out to do

Parson’s explicit aim is to persuade readers that the geopolitical changes beginning in the mid-2020s — the collapse or marginalization of Europe and the simultaneous ascent of parts of Asia — are the product of carefully scripted strategies rather than messy, contingent events. The narrative is arranged as both chronological and thematic: a short historical preface, a reconstruction of the alleged plan and its purported architects, and a sequence of case studies that tie present-day crises to that long game. Along the way, Parson mixes reportage-style anecdotes, selective archival claims, and a running interpretive frame that reads recent events as pieces of a single engineered puzzle.

Strengths

Parson is a strong storyteller. He writes with a voice that’s confident, punchy, and designed to keep a reader hooked. The book’s structure — alternating between sweeping claims and granular anecdotes — creates momentum; when he describes events or documents he presents them in cinematic detail. For readers hungry for a single, coherent narrative to explain geopolitical turbulence, that synthesis is satisfying. The book also performs well as a primer in rhetorical persuasion: Parson anticipates objections, plants provocative questions, and uses rhetorical repetition to hammer home his central thesis that nothing about the arc from 2025 to 2032 was random.

Another notable strength is the author’s willingness to interrogate mainstream narratives. Where many policy books hedge in technocratic language, Parson writes in bold strokes and forces readers to confront uncomfortable possibilities about agency and planning behind historic shifts. For those who already view global politics as the product of elite engineering, this book will feel validating and clarifying.

Weaknesses and problems

Where the book shines rhetorically, it falters methodologically. Parson’s evidentiary approach is selective: documents and anecdotes that fit the thesis are given weight, while inconvenient facts receive brief treatment or are interpreted through speculative frames. The book depends heavily on implication and pattern-matching, which risks conflating correlation with causation. Readers looking for rigorous sourcing, exhaustive citations, or transparent provenance for key documents will be frustrated. Claims presented as “insider” revelations are often accompanied by vague sourcing (unnamed officials, undisclosed letters, redacted passages) that make independent verification difficult.

Another problem is tone. The book’s grand conspiratorial contours sometimes shade into hyperbole, which weakens its credibility for skeptical readers. Parson’s insistence on a single scripted plan tends to flatten the complexity of geopolitics: economic incentives, local politics, chance events, and technological change all play roles that are sometimes minimized in pursuit of a cleaner story.

Key themes and recurring arguments

1. Long-range planning: Parson argues that the geopolitical course from 2025 through 2032 follows a three-phase strategy allegedly conceived by networks of actors over generations. Each phase — destabilization, restructuring, and consolidation — is illustrated with modern events framed as deliberate moves.

2. The fall of Europe: The book presents Europe as a primary target for marginalization through economic pressure, political fragmentation, and engineered crises. Parson traces policy choices and moments of failure as pieces of an intentional strategy.

3. The rise of Asia: Counterbalancing Europe’s decline, Parson claims certain Asian powers were positioned — not accidentally — to gain advantage through coordinated political and economic maneuvers.

4. Information and narrative control: A recurring theme is the manufacture of consent: controlling narratives, suppressing documents, and shaping public opinion are presented as central tactics in the scripted plan.

Style and readability

Parson’s prose is accessible and often brisk, aimed at a general audience rather than specialists. Chapters are relatively short, with emphatic subheadings and vivid anecdotes that make the book easy to read in one sitting. That readability is both a virtue and a danger: the book’s momentum can obscure analytical gaps and the lack of rigorous sourcing. For many readers this tradeoff will be acceptable; for others it will be a dealbreaker.

Who will benefit from this book

This is a book for readers who like sweeping geopolitical narratives, for those intrigued by intelligence-style exposés, and for people who suspect that overt, public explanations seldom tell the whole story. It will also attract readers who enjoy speculative history and who are comfortable with interpretive leaps. Conversely, academics, policy analysts demanding strict sourcing, and readers looking for neutral, balanced assessments of the coming decade of global politics will find the book wanting.

Final assessment

WW3 Has Begun is a provocative, engaging, and unapologetically speculative work. Christopher Parson knows how to tell a compelling story and how to push readers into new interpretive frames. But the book trades epistemic rigor for rhetorical force: its selective sourcing and conspiratorial certainties reduce its persuasiveness for readers who prize verification over narrative coherence. Ultimately, the book succeeds best as a polemic and a narrative scaffold — an invitation to think differently about recent global shifts — rather than as definitive proof that “everything was scripted.”

If you read it expecting a persuasive manifesto that will change the consensus in foreign-policy circles, you will be disappointed. If you read it as a well-crafted, challenging argument that destabilizes comfortable assumptions and encourages further investigation, it delivers.

Find WW3 Has Begun On Amazon!